a peek inside the fishbowl

Last night Julie and I went to see Beyond the Score, an innovative show at the NAC. I was given two tickets awhile back as well as two more for a giveaway. (I briefly met Erica and her husband Mark, the winners of the ticket giveaway. Three cheers for a night on the town!)

Beyond the Score is an interesting premise; take a well-known piece of classical music and break it down. It’s part lecture, part multimedia experience, and part concert. In this case everything revolved around  Mozart’s piano concerto No. 27 (his final piano concerto), a significant piece of music from a prolific composer whose popularity was, unfortunately, waning by the time he composed this piece.

Mozart composed over 600 works and died at the age of 35.

My knowledge of classical musical is pretty limited, but I have a keen appreciation for the artform. I do know that the experience of listening to classical music is enriched by extra information you have going into it. For example, in this case we were told to listen for “laughing strings” that gently mocked, given an explanation of the inclusion of a melody he’d composed for a children’s songbook, the regular presence of a rogue D flat and what it signified, as well as insights into Mozart’s creative process. 

Bill Richardson narrated the first half of the evening – the education part – while actor Pierre Brault dramatized selected parts (with appropriate accents and even humour) for added emphasis. This broke it all up very well and prevented the evening from becoming a dry lecture on music and life in the 1700s.

Brault makes it look so easy. So does Richardson for that matter. No hiccups, no bumps in the road.  There was a bit of singing and miming (!), and the pieces all fit together nicely to tell the larger story.

I’m not qualified to comment on the actual performance – I couldn’t tell you if everyone hit every note – but it was pretty good from where were sitting.

We had great seats thanks to Jennifer Covert and her colleagues at the NAC. We were the second row from the stage, so close we could see the dust on Bill Richardson’s shoes (that’s a good thing, really). It was wonderful to have the opportunity to see everything from this perspective and I really appreciate not being stuck in the back of the room.

The pianist was Katherine Chi. I would have loved to see her hands flying over the keys as this piece sounded like it had its own particular challenges.

I have a deep admiration for stringed instruments and people who can coax beautiful music out of them. I sat there, not knowing whether to drift away in my thoughts or focus on what was happening and mindfully enjoy the music. Sadly (and I have debated posting this detail) my enjoyment of the evening was marred by a fellow-audience member who was wearing too much perfume. It was distracting – dare I say, sickening – and made it difficult to let myself get immersed in the music. Julie and I both had to switch seats after the intermission.

But I can’t let that detract from the whole.

After the performance we got to go backstage (I do love the backstage access!):

…  to meet Pierre Brault, who is eloquent and charming. Thankfully, someone else asked him a couple questions because it would have been awkward otherwise.

 
Someone asked him about his role onstage.

“I can easily get up there and hot dog for 10 minutes,” he said. “But that’s not what I’m here for.”

He made a good point. He could have easily stolen the show, his presence is large, but the focus here is really on the music. Brault also said something interesting about the future of theatre reviews. He gets the blogging thing. Mainstream media isn’t reviewing as much as they used to. He mentioned that he hadn’t heard anything from the CBC’s Alvina Ruprecht since June and they’ve stopped relying on the mass media as much as they used to. The future, for them, is social media. And he’s on the cusp of this shift.

Anyway, Julie and I walked out singing the opening tune. (It sounds like a walk in a garden, doesn’t it? It totally sticks in my head.)

This experience makes me want to see Amadeus again, but I expect there’ll be a run on the DVD this week. :) (Speaking of which, remember this scene? And the laugh? Ha!)

Anyway, yes, thank you NAC, for the opportunity to see this show. I would certainly recommend it to anyone who enjoys a bit of Mozart and can appreciate the extra insight into his life and work.

Thank you everyone for your kind tweets and emails about Bob LeDrew’s and my appearance on CBC radio this morning. The topic was bloggers and freebies.

As many of you already know, I do accept some freebies, but you may not realize how many pitch emails I delete and how few products I actually accept for review.

The interview has now been uploaded to the Ottawa Morning website in case you want to have a listen. Just  go to the archives page and scroll down to the link called “Bloggers and freebies”. (Emma told me afterwards that she thought I sounded “mechanical.” I’m still wondering what that means. Anyway, I can’t listen to myself, so I’m going to leave it to you to have a listen and reassure me that I don’t actually sound like a robot!)

It’s crazy how quickly the time flies by when you’re in the hot seat. Here are a few things I wish I had mentioned (and this is all loosey-goosey because it’s coming straight out of a brain which has only had about four hours sleep):

• Bad pitch vs. Good pitch vs. Unsolicated Mail (remember THE BOX fiasco?) and the pitch policy that followed.
• Bloggers who will do anything for low-value goods and not ask the hard questions …  and what that means to (a) the advertiser/maker of the product (HINT: it’s FREE ADVERTISING) as well (b) the rest of us bloggers. I wish that bloggers would band together and refuse to blog about low-value goods from big companies e.g. that box of cereal and that container of yogurt (and both are pitches I have received and ignored.)
• And in that vein, are PR people taking advantage of bloggers? Personal blogs cultivate relationships. By sending freebies, PR people are capitalizing on that word of mouth. So where is this all going?
• Does that fact that the blogger receive a freebie automatically make them biased in favour in the product? I would argue that no – my readers are my bottom line and I won’t ever jeopardize that relationship – but many people are divided on this issue.
• Spreading the word for good, and not for profit. Blogging about community initiatives, charitable causes, creative projects … that’s using the Power of Blogging for good.  That almost deserves a whole other conversation, because social media marketing is actually pretty cheap to undertake. So how is it helping the little guy?

I would love to continue this thread. What do you think? What would you add to the conversation?

Today is your last chance to drop off school supplies to Ten Thousand Villages!