a peek inside the fishbowl

31 Dec, 2007

The annual Christmas photo – a regular feature

Posted by andrea tomkins in: Misc. life|Photography

sc00ac0971 

I know, I talk about it every year, but I swear, this is the last time I’m having Emma and Sarah’s annual Christmas portrait taken at the Real Canadian Superstore or any other Loblaw-owned studio.

I can’t stand going there. And I won’t go back.

Ultimately it comes down to this: you get what you pay for. And you know what? It ain’t great.

I made our appointment back in November and the earliest they could get us in was December 18. I asked if I could be put on a cancellation list, so we can get in earlier. I was told they didn’t have one, and that if I wanted to get the photo done any earlier I would have to call back to see if there were any cancellations.

Who has the time to do that? I made the appointment anyway, knowing it was going to mess with our mailout of Christmas cards. So everyone other than my mother and Mark’s parents received a copy of a photo I had taken this summer and had reprinted. I figured no one would care anyway. (Although I did.)

Fast forward to the day of the photoshoot.

The girls looked great. They were dressed and ready to go.

The photographer totally rushed us though. (Again, what did I expect?) It didn’t start out great. Sarah was upset about the first pose the photographer (a young girl) set up. Sarah didn’t like the fact that Emma was hugging her from behind.

I would have switched it up, but she stayed with it.

Little did I know that I was going to feel like stabbing myself in the eyeballs several times over during this whole picture-taking process.

The photographer missed the shot every time.

I don’t need a big fake grin. A small, natural, closed-mouth smile is fine with me. And I told her so. Sarah is a small smiler. And she did it, but the photographer would wait – it was excruicating – for a extra beat until Sarah showed teeth, and by then it was always too late.

At one point I was standing next to her. I saw a nice op. “Take the picture!” I said quietly. She didn’t! Arrrgh!

What’s worse, she was babytalking to get them to smile. THEY ARE EIGHT AND SIX YEARS OLD. I stood there while she directed the shoot, entirely in falsetto.

“CAN YOU SAY PURPLE PIZZA? WHO LIKES PURPLE PIZZA? DO YOU LIKE PURPLE PIZZA? PURPLE PIZZA! PURPLE PIZZAAAAAA!!!!”

or:

“CAN YOU SAY STINKY SOCKS? STINKY SOoooOOCKS? DO YOU HAVE STINKY SOCKS? EW! STINKY SOCKS!”

Dear god. I pictured what was happening in my brain, and it looked exactly like a soft-serve ice cream cone that had dropped on hot black asphalt.

Not only was it hurting my brain, but it wasn’t working. Couldn’t she see it wasn’t working?

I had this crazy, slow-motion scene looping my my mind’s eye (complete with background audio of Bionic Man sound effects) of leaping up and grabbing the camera and taking the photo myself. But don’t worry. I was able to control myself.

It finally came to an end, at which point I was forced to choose the photos I hated the least and decide how many wallet size or 8 x 10s I want of them.

When I ask about cropping out the excess space that’s floating over their heads I am always met with a silent pause followed by reluctant acquiescence. I wonder if they think they know more than I do, and that I’m just a crazy old mom who doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

One of my criteria for a great photo is that it has to look like the subjects in the photo. It’s hard to explain, but don’t you find that sometimes you take a photo of your kid and it doesn’t really look like them? They’re probably wearing an expression that’s unnatural. I want to look at a photo and say YES, that’s Emma. And Yes, that’s Sarah’s smile. Emma was great, but most of the photos did not look like the Sarah I know and love.

sc00abef38

When the photographer and I were going though the photos afterwards (I was to pick three poses) she kept pointing out ones that she thought were cute. But the thing is, it’s too easy to do that if you’re not the parent.

“But that’s not her smile,” I’d say. Silence. I don’t think she understood.

I find this whole thing so utterly ironic. I know I can take a great photo, yet there I was, at the Superstore, subjecting myself to undue torture.

So I give up. I wave the white flag of surrender. I share the blame here. We can’t afford to bring the girls to a real studio, so we pay $30 and expect a miracle in return. It’s clear we are asking too much. What we ended up with as the 8 x 10 is okay, I guess, but it’s just OK. Am I being too picky here?

 sc00abb399

I am now doubly determined to rig up a portrait studio in the basement. How hard can it be? But I am going to need a few customers so I can earn back the cost of some lighting. Any takers? ;)


26 Responses to "The annual Christmas photo – a regular feature"

1 | Miss Vicky

December 31st, 2007 at 12:22 pm

Avatar

you can take weeG’s photo any time!

2 | Tana

December 31st, 2007 at 12:27 pm

Avatar

I totally feel your pain. I didn’t go to JCPenny this year, as I usually do, for the same exact reasons. I swore I would take my own photos, and now I have a Canon Rebel XTi and over 2500 photos to choose from. But wallworthy photos? Those are hard to come by. Next year, I am going to have to be more deliberate about taking them so I have some to choose from at the end of the year. I have tons of great candids. My annual calendar was great this year. But again, wall portraits. Next year…

3 | robyn

December 31st, 2007 at 12:29 pm

Avatar

Sounds like quite the experience. Yikes!

As for putting a studio in your basement, there are actually a few local studios that are available to rent – I’ve never tried them, but it would be fun to book one for a day and just shoot photos, all day long. Links below.

Le Studio in Gatineau.

Paul Couvrette apparently rents out his studio.

And I’m not sure if it’s still around, but there used to be a place called Studio 356 that a number of the local fine arts students used, too. It was somewhere along the Preston St. strip and was extremely affordable.

Maybe not helpful now, but for next year, perhaps?

4 | Natalie

December 31st, 2007 at 12:57 pm

Avatar

Andrea I think the shots look great, however, I am not their mom. I think the idea of a home studio is great!

5 | mel

December 31st, 2007 at 1:53 pm

Avatar

I feel your pain, Andrea. It is now five years since we swore off department store studio photos.

Staging the shot so that all our friends and family would be tricked into thinking that my husband was somehow magically taller than me… telling my baby daughter to stick her tongue back in her mouth even though that’s how she smiles… telling me not to smile so big because it makes my eyes too small… all of these I grinned through (although not too widely).

But when the photographer said to my baby nephew that he couldn’t have his bottle until he smiled? GAME OVER.

6 | scatteredmom

December 31st, 2007 at 2:12 pm

Avatar

We had some success at a Walmart over on Vancouver Island, but it was because I have a very enthusiastic kid that took very little prompting to smile. In fact, it took more just to get him to sit still.

I really hate the school photos though. Most of the time they never turn out.

You take such nice photos that I bet you could do better on your own!

7 | Gliding through motherhood

December 31st, 2007 at 3:07 pm

Avatar

We had a very frustrating time this year at the Superstore too! My one year old is active and you have to take the opportunities when they come. She never tried to engage him other than to waggle a stuffed animal in his direction – sorry, you’re going to have to try harder than that.
In the end, I was so unhappy with the shots she got, I didn’t even buy the package. Last year I got five zillion copies of a photo from Walmart that I hated and refused to just buy them because that was my original intent. There was one decent photo and we made that our xmas card and that was it.
In the end we went for a quick photoshoot with a friend of mine who just started a business in her home and she took some fabulous family shots. And she’s SUPER affordable! I’ll post a couple of the photos on my blog – come have a look.
And I think the photos are nice, but I totally understand the thing about it not looking like them.

8 | Carrie

December 31st, 2007 at 4:00 pm

Avatar

I *so* know what you mean! I first took Liam to Sears at six months old for a portrait, and left empty-handed. They couldn’t engage him at all and none of the shots looked like him – just as you say. Talk about incentive to learn how to use my own camera! I have taken him for a ‘formal’ portrait once or twice since then but learned my lesson by the time Mallory arrived. She hasn’t had a single official portrait done but IMHO she is the best-photographed kiddo out there. :) I’m sure sooner or later I will feel guilty about not having something ‘proper’ for her… and I am sure I will feel obligated to buy school photos each year once they are old enough for that – no matter how hideous. :)

9 | Bonita

December 31st, 2007 at 4:01 pm

Avatar

The great thing about taking photos of kids is that they are not afraid of being natural. My friend Kris and I set up a studio every fall and do a photo fund raiser for our local Home and School. The kids are so much fun to take and because we know almost all of them we get them ‘au naturel’…goofs, gafs and all. I snap and Kris gets the ‘happy’ going. If at all possible we try to keep the parents out of view…the kids react much better and to see (or hear, because we are usually taking more photos when the parents are choosing) the parent’s reactions is priceless.
Sometimes all you can get is the fake smile but when you are lucky and catch the real child that is so awesome. That makes it great.

10 | twinmomplusone

December 31st, 2007 at 4:02 pm

Avatar

your own pics of your girls are always so much better than these, which are good btw, but don’t really look like your girls usually do.

I for one, would come to your in-home studio ;)

11 | Carrie

December 31st, 2007 at 4:03 pm

Avatar

PS – I really like the second photo, but no matter how technically good the photo… if it’s not ‘her’… I can completely understand you not liking it.

12 | Ciaochow

December 31st, 2007 at 5:00 pm

Avatar

You’re a great photographer (!) – why not attempt something like this yourself?

My brother sends me these studio shots of his boys every year and every year I swear to myself that if I have children, I will not do this.
My mom frames and displays her copies while I file mine away and frame pictures of them sleeping in their cribs or sitting in the grass with ice cream dripping down their faces.

When families dress up in matching outfits for these studio photos, it really makes me cringe. I don’t know what makes these appealing – it’s like propping kids up in a most unnatural state – staged, backdropped, seated, smiling perfect smiles.

I much prefer candid photographs to these staged and backdropped pieces but wonder if, based on how popular they are, these studio shots just become irresistible when you’re a parent? These photos are nice… nice… but you have so many great photos of your girls enjoying life and those are the ones I’d rather see more of.

My two cents.

13 | Lala

December 31st, 2007 at 6:03 pm

Avatar

I’m hoping like crazy that that young girl who took those shots wasn’t my cousin Jewlie because she works at the one near you and thinks it’s a great job but she has zero skills in photography and little experience with children. I’m hoping she’s smarter than the girl you described but I’m wincing because I know she’s not. I like the studio rental idea myself.

14 | Karen

January 1st, 2008 at 12:36 pm

Avatar

I had a VERY similar experience at RCS in September. I know we had the same girl: she kept saying to Emily “Does your sister have stinky toes? Who has stinky toes? Does Emily have stinky toes?” You could see Emily cringing even at 3 years old and forcing a smile. None of the photos were great and like you I had to choose the best of the worst. I was not happy and I’ve been looking to go somewhere else, but somewhere I can afford. If you are serious about doing this I would be there with the girls at least a couple of times a year.

15 | BeachMama

January 1st, 2008 at 2:39 pm

Avatar

You could earn back the studio money with one booking of my family. My youngest sister bought a family portrait for my parents this year.

Yes. Seventeen of us headed to Superstore ourselves on Sunday. Much to my dismay as I am still carrying way too much baby weight for a family portrait. But, I was told to suck it up, nice eh? Merry Christmas, sorry, I am getting away here….

So we were told not to wear black, which most of us wanted to wear. Why? Because they chose a black background before meeting us. Had I known that was why I would have insisted on a white of light background so we could wear black.

Then the girl with the duck. Trying to make the kids smile. I finally told her to cut it with the duck because every shot of J was him trying to get away from the duck. Anyhow, in the end it wasn’t too bad, but mostly because we had prepped our kids. My gift next year will be to hire a professional to come to the house or go to their studio. Especially if I don’t want these photos on display for the next four or five years like our last portrait. So… long story short… yes we would come and be happy about it. But, there will be 18 of us next year :).

16 | BeachMama

January 1st, 2008 at 2:40 pm

Avatar

ooops and I meant so wish you a Happy New Year!!!

17 | porter

January 2nd, 2008 at 8:40 pm

Avatar

I have never paid to have professional (or not very professional) photos taken of my kids (except this past summer which was actually a gift for my parents)…I sometimes wonder if I will regret this decision. They just don’t appeal to me so I never bothered. I was nodding my head when you were trying to explain that photos have to look like the person…my favourite photos of my kids aren’t always ‘the best’ photos, but they are always the ones that first and foremost take me back to the moment they were taken and also because they just look like MY kids.
Oh and by the way, your girls are always super cute…but the truth is…I think the pictures you post that you’ve taken yourself are far better…hire yourself next time!

18 | Javamom

January 2nd, 2008 at 9:26 pm

Avatar

Andrea, you have such a talent to capture the essence of whatever you are photographing. Why not use one of those shots? Why, why, why do people need or want portrait shots? Taken at those studios?

I can barely tolerate the school (daycare) photo of my child. I like it enough because he’s cute and I can imagine how he was when the school photographer took the picture, but some of my shots, which are nowhere near as great as yours, appeal to me much more. Especially if I managed to capture the essence. Like the shot in this post.

http://javaline.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/this-is-what-we-did-today/

Although hubby thought it wasn’t my best shot bec the head is slightly cut off, I think this is absolutely one of my best shots. You can see the concentration he’s displaying even though you only see his back…what do you think? You have a talent to capture this kind of thing.

So, I encourage you to revisit the portrait studio decision at the end of 2008.

19 | Lorraine

January 5th, 2008 at 10:01 am

Avatar

Your own studio is totally doable. and for lighting try this – http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000GX484U – it’s the:
Photography Studio Continuous Umbrella Light Kit with Free 26w 5500k Fluorescent Photo Light Bulb

and it’s on sale for only 39.99, instead of the regular 99.99. I got one so I could shoot my sister’s wedding, and it totally rocks. Throw in a big velor blanket for a backdrop, a shiny car shade for a reflector, an opaque shower curtain for a diffuser, a decent tripod, and a nice camera, and you’ve got yourself a great little set up.

20 | a peek inside the fish bowl

January 7th, 2008 at 10:23 am

Avatar

[…] The other day I raved about the mentally unhealthy experience I had at our local portrait studio. […]

21 | Sharon

January 7th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

Avatar

Oh poor you. You take so much better photos. I have hardly any photo taken at a studio after the last and first time I took him to wal mart. They were excatly what I paid for. NOT VERY GOOD. Miranda I was lucky with. But him he’s soo active it’s hard to pin him down. So now I take them myself and NOT in a studio setting. Because I feel they are not models but People in real life. KWIM? I’d love a really good Professional sitting but like you I don’t have the Bucks.

After all that blabbling I must say they are nice shots of your girls.

22 | MomOnTheGo

January 15th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

Avatar

I’ve had Reid’s picture taken at the Loblaws on Ogilvie monthly since July 2004, 2 days before I gave birth. Sometimes the pics aren’t exactly what I want but I would blame these on me not listening to Reid’s cues that she isn’t in the mood. I am assertive, though. I will say that I don’t need a huge smile or even any smile, and some of the best pics show Reid pouting, thinking or not looking at the camera. Maybe it helps that I state my expectations at the beginning. (And I know that it seems obsessive to have monthly pics for 3.5 years but my mom lives far away and gets sad when I mention stopping. ;+)

23 | Lindsay

April 2nd, 2009 at 10:28 am

Avatar

To be honest…I work In that very studio!
I will give you the lowdown…

Christmas appointments start booking up in September…not kidding…september! so by november, all the frustrated last minute callers who want their greeting cards mailed out on time all complain that we have no spots available. some nights i have slaved away returning 100 voicemessages of irate customers who want “a 10:00 appt on a saturday morning” (YEAH FRIGGING RIGHT!) those spots were taken 3 months ago buddy! And yeah…i think most people would agree that you would be stupid to cancel any appointment that you DID get…so yeah…we have no time/use for a cancellation list, and if you think we’re going to keep a spot open for just little old you…forget it!

Um, and yeah…Christmas time… a stressful time of year for everybody…for you…and for us too. We have back to back appointments booked for 20 minute time slots, and although we will try our very best to get you great shots (its too bad your experience didnt go well…but nearly eveyone else’s does!) you might not have 20 minutes in the studio to let your kids “settle in nicely”, so yeah you’ll be entering a fast paced environment.

Let me give you a very worthwhile piece of advice. NEVER tell your kid to “smile” or to say “cheese”…then you most defiently will get a grimace. and escpecially if you confuse a child by saying “show mommy a nice, NORMAL smile, but close your lips, no not like that!, like this, no smile naturally.” youre going to confuse the hell out of your kids. and then they wont want photos at all.
Thats why photographers try to make kids laugh…thats the most likely way of capturing a “natural smile” from them. and if their laughing…you cant tell me thats not natural! Rather than confusing the poor kids…tryto go along with what the photographer is doing…laugh at what shes doing and maybe the kids will to! or help the poor girl and try to make them laugh at you! She trying you know!!!!

and as for cropping and editing. Well GOD…we are photographers! we arent retards when it comes to photo-editing. Stop trying to be pretentious and assume you know more than us when it comes to our job! of course we’re going to crop it!
If you receive your edited copies and you dont think they look good, THEN you should complain.

There ARE grounds for complaining sometimes. working there three years iv’e come across photogrpahers that were quite mediocre, and ive seen them treat customers unfairly. But this girl youre talking about…I know her and shes awesome. customers come back monthly and specifically request to have her. And the complaints you have are pretty ridiculous. If you think you can take better photos than us haha….do it then.

24 | andrea

April 2nd, 2009 at 10:50 am

Avatar

Lindsay, your grade-school comments just solidified why I dislike going to the Loblaws portrait studio as much as I do. It’s clear – based on my own experiences and from what you’ve written above – that Loblaws is understaffed and has a tendency to hire people who aren’t exactly professional. Case in point.

25 | Lindsay

May 2nd, 2009 at 10:54 pm

Avatar

Grade School Comments? Alright I’m sorry Andrea, I guess my frustrations sort of caved in there. I guess I felt the need to defend my studio, because I love working there. I was just trying to give you some insight so you might be more pragmatic with your judgement, although I worded it pretty wrong. Sorry about that.

I dont agree with you that the photographers there are unprofessional (Although because It’s a grocery store, most people have that view of us.) Although i can see why you want natural smiles out of your children. Believe me, I Also dislike the cheesy Sears type photography where they stick kids in christmas boxes and make them grimace, and insist that its a good shot . I totally get it.

But I work with a good group of photographers who are not only friendly but are also pretty down to earth. We always make it a point to try and get kids to laugh to try and capture a good smile from them. I love candid photography, its my favourite style. But lets be realistic, thats a hard thing to do when your in a studio environment with a photographer that doesnt know your kids. Next time the photographer is trying to make an idiot out of herself trying to get your kids to laugh or at least be amused, why not just help her?

I think your portraits are pretty good actually, your girls are very cute. Try to be optimistic about what you did get. Beleive me, it could have been worse!

26 | GyliaWelbourne-Joy

November 6th, 2009 at 12:13 pm

Avatar

I know exactly what you are talking about it is the same
@ all the department stores young girls that have no or very little experience behind a camera .Some times the best shots are the unplanned shots.I have gotten so frustrated with them I have started my own studio @ home doing just childrens Photographic Art. I am going to specialize in is children,babies ,maternity not your particular posed moments either diferent poses with props
Sleighs, trees ,scarves and mittens
We are going to be doing Fairy Portraits soon ,and Winter wonderland Settings . Just getting things set up for Christmas My husband is just getting the Studio ready now.And I know what you Ladies go through to get children ready for pics it is a process I am out @ Strathmore Alberta If you live close give me a call @403-325-0070 I would love to work with you and it will be fun we also do your greetings cards for christmas or any time we can put you pkgs together
Have a Great Day Miss Priss Photography

comment form:

Archives

Me and my pet projects

Ottawa Bucket list

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


  • alex: For a classic Canadian treat for valentine day , try a BeaverTail (a fried dough pastry) there its yummy
  • E: Hi there!
  • Juliet Luiz: I was at this park today and saw the foundation and historical sign which got me curious and let me to your blog post! Great information:) too bad t
  • Clarence: You could certainly see your skills in the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how
  • Jare: it's a tough job for you. If you need help with moving heavy stuff, we are looking forward to working with you Foosun Moving https://foosunmoving.ca
  • Jare: Your article is helpful. if you're moving out, please contact Foosun Moving https://foosunmoving.ca/
  • Rowyn Tape: Hello, I was sitting at Easter dinner with my grandmother and she was telling me this story. She is Herbert Lytles daughter who eventually bought the

The Obligatory Blurb

My name is Andrea and I live in the Westboro area of Ottawa with my husband Mark and our dog Piper who is kind of a big deal on Instagram. We also have two human offspring: Emma (24) and Sarah (22). During the day I work as a writer at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre. I am a longtime Ottawa blogger and I've occupied this little corner of the WWW since 1999. The Fishbowl is my whiteboard, water cooler, and journal, all rolled into one. I'm passionate about healthy living, arts and culture, travel, great gear, good food, and sharing the best of Ottawa. I also love vegetables, photography, gadgets, and great design.

If you'd like to contact me, please use this form. If you're so inclined, you can read more about me here. Thank you for visiting!

 


Connect with me at these places too!

Still calling it Twitter