Did you ever read Blubber, by Judy Blume?
From what I recall (keeping in mind that I read this story about 25 years ago) the story is generally about the social dynamics of a group of fifth graders, and how one girl (the one who was cruelly nicknamed Blubber) deals with it.
This is where I first heard about the Slam Book. It’s a blank book (or page) that gets passed around the class and everyone writes what they really think of you – anonymously of course. I did this with a small group of friends in fourth grade.
What a weird idea, I mean, didn’t anyone consider that handwriting can be recognized?
On one hand the slam book idea is totally awful and mean, yet on the other hand, if you could remove the vitriol or hatred from the equation, I wonder if it would be valuable to find out if others perceive you in some way that could be altered or softened.
I have a specific situation in mind here. In seventh grade one of the girls in my school told me I was a snob. This is not something I dwell on but I have never forgotten her words.
I was shocked anyone would think I was a snob. I was shocked that anyone even bothered spending the time thinking or talking about me. I was shocked because I was just a regular, shy person and was deeply hurt that my behaviour was being interpreted so wrongly. I knew I wasn’t a snob, why couldn’t the people on my periphery know that too?
You’re probably wondering where this is coming from. Ms.D had an interesting take on it in a recent interview.
So my question to you is this: would you like to know what people think of you or is it better to stay in the dark?
(I’m not even going to touch the modern-day culture of BLOGS. If you have a blog you’ve undoubtedly received an anonymous comment or email telling you what someone REALLY THINKS of you. Not much different from a slam book, is it?)

